Re: Inheritance in Revolution?

[Dan Shafer]

At the end of the day, speaking as an old Smalltalker who thinks 
objects rule, I've just had give up on the OO dream when  using Rev. As 
you've learned, it's not implemented and although there are some worthy 
work-alikes, they're not really satisfactory to an OO thinker.

There has been a lot of back-channel talk about either creating an OO 
version of Transcript or forking a new IDE/Language combo for OO folks 
but my guess is that's a pretty distant dream at this point.

Dan
On Sep 11, 2004, at 3:00 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Arthur Urban wrote:
There is something similar that's been in
discussion and will hopefully be
implemented in the next version (or the one
after that), and it's being
called "parentScripts". Sort of an
object-specific "backscript", you can
assign the script of an object as the
"parentScript" to one or more other
objects. This would allow 25 buttons to use the
same script of its parent.
isn't this what a group script for
25 grouped buttons should do?
Sure. But what if your 25 buttons aren't on the same card or the same 
stack?
They may still all need the exact same behaviour.
Use a frontscript that differentiates based on a property setting.
--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___________________________________________________________
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution