I believe the answer to my previous question is NO the error will occure and you  will 
get a error dialog.

K


-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:

Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental. 
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.

 The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
 is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. 
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)



 --- On Fri 10/29, K < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: K [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:55:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Very strange question?

<br><br>If a command is execute and messageNotHandled handles the message will RR 
still throw an error? <br><br>Example:<br><br>on mouseUp<br>  undefinedHandler 
"parameter"<br>  get undefinedFunction( "parameter" ) <br>end mouseUp<br><br>In the 
case the to calls called undefinedXXX do not exist?  So if these are passed through 
messageNotHandled are the considerd handled and do not cause a error? 
<br><br><br><br>-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>Any 
resemblance between the above views and those of my<br>employer, my terminal, or the 
view out my window are purely<br>coincidental. <br>Any resemblance between the above 
and my own views is non-deterministic.<br><br> The question of the existence of views 
in the absence of anyone to hold<br>them<br>is left as an exercise for the reader. The 
question of the existence of<br>the reader<br> is left as an exercise for the second 
god coefficient. <br>(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheis
 m is beyond the<br>scope of this article.)<br><br><br><br> --- On Fri 10/29, K < 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:<br>From: K [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>To: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]<br>Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:44:53 -0400 (EDT)<br>Subject: Re: Very strange 
question?<br><br><br><br>I found that message myself but was not very successful with 
it (didn't spend much time on it). I will make a attempt to explore it 
further.<br><br>Thanks for the 
suggestion.<br><br><br>-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>Any
 resemblance between the above views and those of my<br>employer, my terminal, or the 
view out my window are purely<br>coincidental. <br>Any resemblance between the above 
and my own views is non-deterministic.<br><br> The question of the existence of views 
in the absence of anyone to hold<br>them<br>is left as an exercise for the reader. The 
question of the existence of<br>the reader<br> is left as an exercise for the second 
god coefficient. 
 <br>(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the<br>scope 
of this article.)<br><br><br><br> --- On Fri 10/29, Richard Gaskin < [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:<br>From: Richard Gaskin [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>To: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]<br> nrev.com<br>Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:40:19 -0700<br>Subject: Re: Very 
strange question?<br><br>K wrote:<br>> Is is possible to create a script 
handlers/functions that will catch all un-caught messages? If so how would this 
work?<br><br>When the messageMessages global property is set to true, a script can 
<br>catch two new messages, which are fired for each message 
sent:<br><br>messageHandled<br>messageNotHandled<br><br>These are not documented, so 
officially they may be subject to change. <br>But I learned about them by poking 
around in Rev's unlocked scripts, so <br>if Rev uses 'em their longevity potential 
seems reasonable.<br><br>-- <br>  Richard Gaskin<br>  Fourth World Media Corporation<br
 >  ___________________________________________________________<br>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 >       
 > http://www.FourthWorld.com<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution
 >  mailing list<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listi<br> 
 > nfo/use-revolution<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Join
 >  Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>The most personalized portal on the 
 > Web!<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing 
 > list<br>[EMAIL 
 > PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Join
 >  Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>The most personalized portal on the 
 > Web!<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing 
 > list<br>[EMAIL 
 > PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to