I use try catch all the time being orginally a C++ developer. However, I am looking to
a way to do this globally and return as though the error never occured. With try catch
it goes immediatly to the catch block no matter the situation.
K
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:
Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental.
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient.
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)
--- On Fri 10/29, Trevor DeVore < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Trevor DeVore [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:32:58 -0700
Subject: Re: Very strange question?
On Oct 29, 2004, at 1:16 PM, K wrote:<br>> I guess my question has mutated. Is is
possible with a front script <br>> to catch all "errors" process them (if one dems
them of the approiate <br>> type) and have the calling script continue processing
where it left <br>> off with a ret value?<br><br>This doesn't answer your question
directly but if you are trying to <br>call a handler which may or may not exist then
you can do this:<br><br>try;idontExistFunction();catch errno;end try<br><br>and your
scripts will keep on going even if the function doesn't exist. <br> Would this help
in your case?<br><br><br>-- <br>Trevor DeVore<br>Blue Mango Multimedia<br>[EMAIL
PROTECTED]<br><br>
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
