Hi, BvG> On Nov 07 2004, at 23:46, DJ Grumble wrote:
BvG> note: this is the hard way, with datagramm sockets its way simpler, but BvG> that's the way i would do it :) out of curiosity :-) what would be simpler with Datagramm ????? otherwise, can someone tell me the pros and cons of communicating between revolution and an outside program using "the open process" versus open socket ( the outside program reads few properties from revolution during the execution and then write to some others... ) please, nothing to do with the shell() command. the environment is Win98, NT and XP regards, thierry BvG> --server button: BvG> on mouseUp BvG> accept connections on port "8181" with message "incomming" BvG> end mouseUp BvG> on incomming remoteIP BvG> read from socket remoteIP until return with message "gotOne" BvG> end incomming BvG> on gotOne remoteIP theMessage BvG> put theMessage into field "Your field here" BvG> close socket remoteIP BvG> end gotOne BvG> --client field: BvG> on returnInfield BvG> open socket "localhost:8181" with message "contacted" BvG> end returninfield BvG> on contacted theIP BvG> write the text of me & return to socket theIP BvG> end contacted _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
