Recently, Scott Rossi wrote: > I don't quite follow what you're asking here (like Dave, my brain is > starting to ache), but it prompted me to try something else: > > on runTimer > if not the uAllowTimer of me then exit runTimer > send "runTimer" to me in 100 millisecs > put the long time into fld 1 > end runTimer
Sorry my mistake. This should have been: on runTimer if not the uAllowTimer of me then exit runTimer send "runTimer" to me in 1000 millisecs # <--- 1 second put the long time into fld 1 end runTimer ...which runs lower in terms of processor use. This is definitely a lot less than sending 10 times a second, but the for me, the question remains: is "send in" better to use than "wait x with messages"? Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Development & Design ----- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.tactilemedia.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
