On Nov 29, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
It looks to me that using "send in time" is efficient.
Actually, I was referring to "efficiency" in terms of placing demands
on the
system, not in the amount of time to process within Rev.
Oh, I see what you mean. I used Activity Monitor on OS X and got this:
Send cycle (.1 s period): 16%
Default Button: 29%
Both: 35%
Send cycle (.05 s period) 35% (fluctuates a lot)
Send cycle (.01 s period) 101%
Send cycle (1 s period) 2%
I'm on OS X 10.3.6 using a dual 1.25 GHz G4.
Dar
****************************************
Dar Scott Consulting
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
Programming Services
****************************************
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
