On May 25, 2005, at 12:05 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Looking at RevOnline it appears that the concept of "trusted" sites
has already been implemented -- is it not documented?
Where are you looking?
The v2.5 docs describe a host of security and encryption options,
including secure sockets, and watching messages shows calls named
rvoSecureStatus, rvoSecureCancel, and ulIsSecure.
Not sure what they do, but since Rev is aware of security concerns and
RevOnline premiered when secure sockets premiered it would seem
reasonable that they use secure sockets to validate channels.
It would be nice to have a statement on the RevOnline security--its
capabilities and what it does not do.
Suppose I trust Richard Gaskin (reasonable, I think), is there a way to
translate that to being comfortable in downloading a particular stack
from Revolution Online?
Dar
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
