Total agreement... Gordon Webster wrote:
I would absolutely echo what Dennis has just said. I was initially really impressed with rev and I should say I still am in certain respects - comfort and ease of use, the elegant and intuitive language and stack/card paradigm etc. etc. But I have been unable to get rev to do what I want it to do behind the scenes (i.e. my application logic) without jumping through the kinds of hoops that Dennis describes - effectively negating all the advantages of programming in Transcript that I just outlined. And even when I could get the code working, man it was SLOW. It was discouraging to see Python easily outrun rev for the equivalent code - I mean I love Python and all, but it's hardly the gold standard for speed.
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
