Dan,
That's what I got from the first post, exactly. I tend to agree with
your statement and your logic is sound. (not that you need me to say
so)
I just wanted to agree to this and don't want to see Rev changed in
another direction.
Thanks
Tom
On Jun 23, 2005, at 8:20 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
My argument is NOT against the ability to build externals to do
whatever one wishes to do, including platform-specific things if you
want to make your life more complicated and miserable or if you only
have to deliver a product to users of a single platform. My argument
is against Rev modifying the engine/tool to accommodate
platform-specific features in a way that causes the code of those of
us who don't want to use such features to break when it runs on other
platforms or to jump through a bunch of conditional hoops all the time
to get code to run on other platforms to accommodate single-platform
features.
Thomas J McGrath III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
412-831-3094
220 Drake Road
Bethel Park, PA 15102
<*)) >=<
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to
skid in sideways - a Cigar in one hand - a large steak in the other -
your body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming - WOO
HOO! What a Ride!"
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
