Jon- Sunday, July 31, 2005, 12:15:53 PM, you wrote:
J> Mark: J> The point I was TRYING to make <grin> was that FOR loop variables 1) had J> to be declared locally; and 2) could not be modified inside a loop. I J> was trying to make a general case for this kind of a definition of an J> "error". Ah. Gotcha. Yes - that's at least somewhat mind-boggling. A semi-related point that seems to bother nobody but me is that you don't have to declare loop variables (i.e., Variable Checking [aka explicitVars] doesn't catch them), but if you don't explicitly declare them as local then they become global by default, in which case you get namespace conflicts. Declaring "local x" when you've already got a "repeat for x=1 to 10" line somewhere in your script will cause a compiler error at the "local x" line. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
