hi

personally i've pushed mc/rev to the limits (& beyond) for some of my projects the last few years

i've been investigating a few of these issues & various other technologies (on the "market") over the last few weeks & usually in my head i'm thinking... well, it can be done in rev.. ~not~ that rev is perfect.. yet ;)

the most consistent & important issue on my plate is the "interface".. it has to work the way i want it to, doesn't matter the backend (which, again an area rev is maturing). the point is, the interface is where the action is

someone made a point about debugging ajax.. mainly i think its because you're dealing with a mixed bag of tricks to make your interface work.. the most popular combo is your typical opensource combo of linux, apache, php etc but down under here in oz microsoft is top of the pop chart, ipods excluded :)

but even in the cgi area, rev is improving.. it still seems to need libraries which i've discovered are not on all public web-hosting services.. personally, i really dislike doing cgi stuff and would much rather do it in transcript.. on that subject..

a quick question for the runrev crew..

* Is it possible to get/order custom-compiled versions of rev? (eg. Stripped down super efficient cgi engine without ~any~ gui code but still database functional)

i currently develop & test on 3 (mac,pc,linux) platforms & as a one-man team i prefer rev's unified approach to development

flash is pretty good too.. my update8 is still on order :(

one project i completed last year was actually a flash-rev combo which worked well (would have been better if i had altbrowser at the time.. currently redeveloping my framework all in rev)

even a "toy" language like blitzmax is exciting because it offers arcade-quality possibilties in the interface department (in slick opengl 3d etc) & is cross-platform, early days yet but possible to do server/cgi with & talk to sqlite .. but it's ultimately nostalgic & the forum participants are mainly a younger generation.

rev can't do that and it doesn't need to but i find the new version of rev quite stable & have been happily using it the last few days for a project, although i still get weird coloured syntax highlighting issues, more so that ye ol metacard :)

regards
alex

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Today's Topics:

   3. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (Trevor DeVore)
   4. RE: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (MisterX)
   9. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (Mark Wieder)
  10. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (Chipp Walters)
  11. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  12. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (Chipp Walters)
  13. Re: Rev vs. AJAX...Or Web-Aware Apps vs. Web Apps (Dan Shafer)
  14. Re: Rev vs. AJAX... Ajax vs TAOO ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to