Dennis- Sunday, October 16, 2005, 9:58:04 AM, you wrote:
> to Forth. Forth is a low level but extensible language and IDE from Forth? (Running over to x's web site to check it out...) Forth is as close to the metal as you can get without writing in ones and zeros. > One of the weaknesses of XTalk/Transcript in my opinion was that you > could not directly and efficiently extend the language in this same way. XTalk would be more on the path to Forthness if we could overload keywords and add new ones. Of course, that would probably also require namespaces and an include mechanism. Imagine patching "trunc" so that it does the right thing by: function trunc pValue return trunc(pValue & "") end trunc -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
