Recently, Dennis Brown wrote: > I am not interested in supporting a mish-mash unstructured free-for- > all of information. That is not the point at all. I like much of > the structure of the current embedded Rev documentation. The > dictionary is immeasurably useful. It is even more useful when > integrated into the script editor as done in Constellation. Web > notes could have been useful --if it actually worked. > > However, if RunRev were to just make a wiki available and say have at > it, I would fear eminent failure.
This is exactly the kind of discussion that should move to the RevDocs group. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RevDocs/ Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design ----- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.tactilemedia.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
