Charles- Thursday, November 24, 2005, 7:05:31 AM, you wrote:
> But it doesn't seem to be a necessary condition. The factors of 36 -- > by the double definition you have to use in order to make sense of > the statement of the problem -- are either > 1 36 2 2 3 3 > or > 1 36 2 3 > -- which counted one way amount to 6 and the other, 4, neither of > which is conspicuously odd. It looks to me as though old Tom is > wrong. Gee, does that ever happen? ??? I count the factors of 36 as being: 1 2 3 4 9 18 36 and that seems odd to me... -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
