"Bill Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well for reasons I may not be aware of, all the new commands seem to be in > the format, "revDoSomething" followed by parameters. Example: > > revAddXMLNode treeID, parentPath, nodeName, nodeContents > > the official example: > > revAddXMLNode 9,"/","Balls","" > > Why couldn't you say something like > > add node "Balls" to the root path of XML tree id 9 > > I'm not saying that is the exact perfect syntax, nor is it "compact," but it > would be super readable/self-documenting and easy to remember. This is what > I mean about advancing TransScript.
Even simpler, why can't you say something like if image "picture" is visible ... instead of if the visible of image "picture" is true ... My (young) students find this difficult. There are many ways in which Transcript could be even more english-like. - marty -- Marty Billingsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The University of Chicago Laboratory Schools _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
