Jacque- > Try:
> start using stack "substack 1" of stack "A" > That puts it in the back. Thanks. It doesn't, but it comes close enough. The syntax I needed was put the script of stack "substack 1" of stack "A" into back I didn't realize you could use the "stack of stack" syntax without the compiler barfing. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
