Hi Garrett,
> I guess I'm not specifically upset with the bug issue, but with > several issues. My views of how things should be are not > that of the > majority. I can be extreme in my views about products should > be free > of bugs and such. And usually "you get what you pay for" > holds true, > but I'm feeling cheated here. Typically if you pay hundreds, > you get > a sold product, and I don't see that now. And I see a company that > may or may not have some of it's own internal management and > priority > issues. While I can understand your frustration I can say - categorically - that in my twenty years plus as a programmer I'm yet to find a development platform that had no bugs - even show stoppers! The reason is simple. Hardware and OS and well as other running software (anti-virus and a plethora of others). Over these years I have come to accept this as the way it is - as do many developers - and that an update to a prior release is usually dispatched after a given period, where as upgrades are less frequent and generally include bug fixes and new elements and in the process start a whole new round of bugs. I'm yet to find a programming platform that has zero bugs. Compared to other cross-platform tools I have used (RealBasic, Kylix and some others) Rev is incredibly stable and the price is right (QT C++ sells for around US $1,200 for the basic package). Cheers Scott _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
