I don't tend to use getProp/setProp all that much, I must say, and as you know with Rev, there are usually many ways of achieving a given aim. One way I use setprop is when I'm storing some data into a custom prop of some object, and I need things to happen whenever that custom prop is changed, though, as you point out, a setCPtoValue command would work just as well. It just feels more natural to me to set a custom prop at those times...but that's just how I think.

The setProp message also gets sent up the message path until handled, so if you have a bunch of fields on a card, each containing a list of numbers that you want to total, at different times for each field, you could have in the card script

setProp tTotal
  put the text of the target into numList
  replace cr with comma in numList
  put cr & sum(numList) after the target
end tTotal

So you can then - set the tTotal of fld 1 to empty
and field 1 is then updated to show it's total.


Of course you could achieve this any number of ways, but it's another option, which might be more or less convenient depending on context and your own view.


Best,

Mark

On 12 Apr 2006, at 23:11, J. Landman Gay wrote:

Devin Asay wrote:
On Apr 12, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
Does anyone have any examples on the get/setProps in real usage? I have been using custom props but not the setProp etc. I would love some more insightful ideas on it's usage.
The way I use it is much more pedestrian than the Marks'. For me it's a really easy way to make sure my interface objects get set to the proper states. For example, let's say I want to toggle between an 'editable' and 'noneditable' mode for a text editor:
setProp editMode pMode
  if pMode then
    enable button "Save"
    enable button "TextColor"
    set the lockText of fld "myfld" to true
    set the traversalOn of fld "myFld" to true
  else
    disable button "Save"
    disable button "TextColor"
    set the lockText of fld "myfld" to false
    set the traversalOn of fld "myFld" to false
  end if
pass editMode -- the docs say you have to explicitly pass it to have it set the prop
end editMode

I have thought about doing this many times, but I usually revert back to using a command or function handler instead, probably out of habit. For example, the above could also be done by:

  setEditMode true

rather than using a property assignment like "set the editmode...". For me, seeing a handler name informs me that there is a related script somewhere. Setting a property doesn't give me the same, immediate knowledge; later on when I've forgotten why I wrote a script a certain way, seeing a statement that sets a property doesn't tell me as clearly that a lot of other actions will be taking place at the same time.

Now I'm curious what's the advantage, if any, of using a setProp handler over a standard command handler? This isn't just to you, Devin, but to anyone who uses these regularly.

I should also say that I do use one of these routinely: when I set a stack's version number property, I often use a setProp handler that updates the version display in an About box, or wherever else it happens to show. In this case, I usually set the version property from the message box, so a setProp handler gives me an automated way to get a lot of stuff done without having to type in (and remember) a handler name. But when called from inside a script, I'm not sure what the advantages would be.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to