On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
Has anyone supporting this on the basis of brevity stopped to
consider the irony that one can script the same functionality in
"verbose" Revolution in significantly fewer lines than it takes
using "succinct" C? So you want the productivity (and
maintainability) of Revolution AND the brevity of C? To quote Bob
Seeger's "Beautiful Looser", "You just can't have it all."
Lingo, the most successful xtalk of them all, does.
And now, I'll leave this knitting group again, with this final
statement. When something is not as popular as you think it should
be, you look at what should be changed, not why it should stay the same.
<unsub for the last time>
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
