On 8 Sep 2006, at 15:07, Mark Smith wrote:
This is to do with where the centuryCutoff is - if you set it to 5, you should get the expected answer (100 yrs, 0 months), I think.
I should have added that 9/1/1906 is not really a valid short date, I don't think - I think the engine simply takes the last two digits of the year and applies the centuryCutoff, you can probably get round this by using the long date.
Best, Mark _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
