On 10/11/06 12:10 PM, "Trevor DeVore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Ken Ray wrote: > >> So unless there's some dissenting opinion on this, I'd recommend >> logging >> this as a bug in Bugzilla. > > I would like to dissent :-) I think if a control is disabled it > should not receive events regardless of the opaque property. It is > disabled meaning it shouldn't do anything. This is a handy way to > turn off interface elements. Actually what I mean is that it shouldn't act like it doesn't exist... if you click on a disabled opaque button, it shouldn't pass the click to things behind it... Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
