On 10/11/06 5:23 PM, "Trevor DeVore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Ken Ray wrote: > >> Actually what I mean is that it shouldn't act like it doesn't >> exist... if >> you click on a disabled opaque button, it shouldn't pass the click >> to things >> behind it... > > Ah. I could see how you could make an argument either way but like > Malte I have come to rely on the current behavior. I think where I'm coming from is that none of the other xTalks I've used (HyperCard, SuperCard, Oracle Media Objects, etc.) behave this way, so to me it seems "wrong". I wouldn't want to suggest that it should be changes to break other people's code, but perhaps some way to make it not do that (a new global property, a new object property, etc.) would be nice. Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
