Mark, Normally I'd agree with you, and this is why I tried to specifically address WHY I don't feel Bugzilla is the appropriate avenue at this point, in my original post. To oversimplify, I feel end-user bug reporting is good for helping to track down obscure or difficult-to-pin-down issues -- NOT addressing core problems that should be obvious with cursory examination. Sure there's a huge range of things in between, but hopefully you get my gist.
It's moot now, as my trial of 2.7.4 is expired. I'll have to wait-and-see for the next version. Like I said, it takes time to file these reports, and my job is NOT to do free, full-time QA for Rev. Surely as a QA professional you can understand the value of such work. Mark Wieder wrote: > While I agree with you on all these points (all right - I haven't seen > the application error on quit thing, but I'll grant that YMMV) I do > have to take issue with this one. The first step in getting some of > these problems fixed is to write up a report on it. The BZ interface > is the connection between the users and the rev team. They may look in > on the list casually now and then, but they do pay attention to the > bug reports. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
