Never cease to be amazed how something functioning in an earlier version can break so freely in upgrades. Who is minding the store, anyhow? And if it was broken between 2.7.2 and 2.7.5 (as reported by Trevor), any excuse why it wasn't remedied in 2.8? Aargh.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor DeVore Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:52 PM To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Itemization of detailed files changed in v 2.8? On Feb 26, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Mark Powell wrote: > In 2.8, I am getting modification dates of 1969 due to the zero in > item 5. Is anyone else seeing this, or am I just hallucinating > (again)? http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=4474 -- Trevor DeVore Blue Mango Learning Systems www.bluemangolearning.com - www.screensteps.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
