On 03/02/2007 at 1:28 PM, Ken Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually it's kind of worse than that. Microsoft does not allow any of > the Basic or Home versions to be used in virtualilzed environments. You > need to purchase the Business or Ultimate version to allow for that > (BTW, they're getting a lot of heat for that, which they *should* IMHO).
I love running virtual machines too, but how is this any different than what Apple is doing? I have discussed virtialization of OS X with representatives of Parallels. Their response is that they have the technology to do it but Apple just won't let them. If Apple can make a business decision to control virtialization of their OS, why can MS not do the same? I understand that Apple is a smaller company trying to increase market share -for hardware-, but they are doing so by making someone elses product work with their product. In all fairness, both companies have the legal right to prevent their product from working on a competitive architecture IMHO. Roger Eller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
