"Sounds kind of pornographic doesn't it :)"

Nothing wrong with that ;-) Take a look at the HTTP specs and the codes 416 "Requested Range Not Satisfiable" and 417 "Expectation Failed" almost looks like the women of the working group were making fun of the men on the working group ;-)


Anyways, back to the topic at hand.. I too attempted to use a "private command" with parameters passed by reference and was just given a 417 as well (see above for the joke)

I also came across another problem with the new "private command" feature and have detailed it in bug report 4997, but the basic gist of it is you can't use "private commands" for socket callback messages which is too bad because those are basically the ones I personally want to hide from the public API of the libraries *sigh*

<http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=4997>


-Sean
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to