I agree completely with Chipp. Good readily and obviously available
template stacks much as Judy outlined them would be far more useful
and much less dangerous.
Joe Wilkins
On Jun 6, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
Nothing. Absolutely Nothing. Any stack which launches everytime Rev
does,
goes into the memory footprint and possibly adds frontscripts,
backscripts
providing more opportunity to mess with the fragile IDE. Until the
IDE runs
in it's own thread, I'd rather see some good demo stacks than a
Home stack.
As I recall, the Home stack did a number of things for HC users. It
introduced them to HC, provided a place for permissioning, showed some
samples along with code, provided clip art and buttons, allowed
users to use
it as an Address book, etc.. To pollute the Rev IDE with all of
this seems a
bit overwhelming to me.
There certainly must be a better way to create a strong first time
user
experience?
-Chipp
On 6/6/07, Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IWhat would you expect to see in a Rev Home stack?
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
