Björnke et al- Tuesday, June 19, 2007, 9:40:50 PM, you wrote:
> This is looking completely wrong at the issue. A variable should be > changeable, it's in the definition of the name. If a variable is not > changeable it should be renamed to "constant" or maybe > "don'ttouchthisthingy". If a user changes a variable, it should not > throw errors, or behave unexpected. Most people have enough problems > with expected behaviour, no need to complicate the matter. If anyone's interested, this is BZ #3036. It's an enhancement request to change the way loop "variables" operate, and has been sitting in an "unconfirmed" state for two years now. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
