For some reason, until I read Stephen's latest post, the word "Break"
escaped me, which is what I meant rather than "exit", though I
suppose the latter could be used as well. Just not as meaningful.
Joe Wilkins
On Jun 21, 2007, at 11:29 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
I agree, much cleaner and easier to follow and write, so long as
you don't forget to exit each of the case statements so as not to
have subsequent ones executed as well. I believe this is a feature
in Rev, though I'd prefer if it weren't.
It's more of a feature of "switch" statements. That's just how they
work, in any programming language.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
