On 27/8/01 6:58 pm, Ben Rubinstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * I think it is change in policy, or the previous policy was misleading,
> because what I think everyone understands as an 'update' is a differential
> price for owners of an existing version to get a new version. What you
> imply here is that there are no update prices at all; a person who owns
> version 1.0 will subsequently be able to choose to buy a license for 1.1 at
> the same price as someone who has never previously bought a license. There
> is no update price. I don't think that is what anyone reading the pricing
> page would have expected - certainly both Curry and I read it as implying
> that there would be such a thing as an update price, and asked (on- and
> off-list) what that price would be.
Just to clarify this matter, purchasing updates to a Standard license *does*
fit into this definition - i.e. you do *not* have to purchase the license
again, there is a reduced price update path which has as yet not been
determined or published. There is no change in policy.
And no, *none* of our license types expire, ever.
Greetings from holiday in Sydney,
Kevin
Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.runrev.com/>
Runtime Revolution Limited - Power to the Developer!
Tel: +44 (0)131 718 4333. Fax: +44 (0)1639 830 707.
