On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Scott Kurz <[email protected]> wrote: > One more detail that might be relevant is the fact that the POJO/bean > type and the interface (and therefore wrapper) type are in different > packages. I seem to remember this in certain cases in the past > mattering. > > I'd been wondering whether it was better to open a new JIRA or re-open > a 1.x JIRA; sorry for going quiet there.... > > Scott >
Hi David. It was actually the other Simon that made the 1.x change (he knows lots about the generation code and may be able to add more detail here). It would be great if you want to work up a patch to fix this in 2.x. We're always looking for contributions;-) Give it a go and let us know what support/help you need as you go along. Scott, that different package thing does ring a very distant bell for me but maybe it just comes from 1.x when creating beans in different packages to test simple WSDL gen [1]. Another thing we could do with is some more thorough and consolidated WSDL gen testing in 2.x. Quite a few of the 1.x test haven't been ported over. When we do I think we should look to turn them into a more complete and consistent test case. [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-1.x/trunk/itest/wsdlgen/src/main/java/ Regards Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
