Sorry Simon, I didn't realize there two Simons in the team. I'll give it a go in the next few days and let you guys know if I need some help.
@Scott: thanks for the tip, I'll keep it in mind. I included a link to the original JIRA ticket in the new one for reference. Also, I run into two other strange issues when trying to build a RESTful service, but I will confirm them and post them later in a separate thread. Cheers, David On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Scott Kurz <[email protected]> wrote: > > One more detail that might be relevant is the fact that the POJO/bean > > type and the interface (and therefore wrapper) type are in different > > packages. I seem to remember this in certain cases in the past > > mattering. > > > > I'd been wondering whether it was better to open a new JIRA or re-open > > a 1.x JIRA; sorry for going quiet there.... > > > > Scott > > > > Hi David. > > It was actually the other Simon that made the 1.x change (he knows > lots about the generation code and may be able to add more detail > here). It would be great if you want to work up a patch to fix this in > 2.x. We're always looking for contributions;-) Give it a go and let us > know what support/help you need as you go along. > > Scott, that different package thing does ring a very distant bell for > me but maybe it just comes from 1.x when creating beans in different > packages to test simple WSDL gen [1]. Another thing we could do with > is some more thorough and consolidated WSDL gen testing in 2.x. Quite > a few of the 1.x test haven't been ported over. When we do I think we > should look to turn them into a more complete and consistent test > case. > > [1] > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-1.x/trunk/itest/wsdlgen/src/main/java/ > > Regards > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
