3-5 times slower does not sound correct. I would be curious to hear how you setup and administered these tests.
Brandon On 2/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sven, > > thanks for your response. I did some preliminary test on iBATIS' > performance. For JDBC (MySql 5.0), i recorded time from establishing > connection, result set, and mapping the result to objects. For list of > simple objects, it seems to me that iBATIS (no caching and lazyloading) is > 3-5 times slower than using JDBC. Of course, i believe my xml mapping has > room to improve. > > The reason I asked is that I need some stats to persuade myself and > coworkers to accept iBATIS as a data persistence tool for our relatively > heavily loaded servers. > > btw, we just pushed a project using iBATIS to QE. For that project, > performance is not big issue. > > Thanks, > Tony
