Post your test code, and I'll show you what's wrong with it.
Clinton
On 2/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sven,thanks for your response. I did some preliminary test on iBATIS' performance. For JDBC (MySql 5.0), i recorded time from establishing connection, result set, and mapping the result to objects. For list of simple objects, it seems to me that iBATIS (no caching and lazyloading) is 3-5 times slower than using JDBC. Of course, i believe my xml mapping has room to improve.The reason I asked is that I need some stats to persuade myself and coworkers to accept iBATIS as a data persistence tool for our relatively heavily loaded servers.btw, we just pushed a project using iBATIS to QE. For that project, performance is not big issue.Thanks,Tony
