oh... you're doomed ;-) On 2/20/07, Brad Handy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess I should've mentioned I'm using Sybase. :o) On 2/20/07, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > i.e. is it a join with a bridge table or not (1:M or M:N)? > > Regardless, I wonder if a recursive result map would work....It might. > > <resultMap id="Node" ... > > <result name="children" ... resultMap="Node"/> > ... > > I don't see any reason why that would cause any problems...perhaps try > it and let us know. > > Cheers, > Clinton > > On 2/19/07, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Oh...is it a self join? > > > > Clinton > > > > On 2/19/07, Brad Handy < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I guess I'll have to take a different approach. The depth isn't set > > > to be a defined level; so if I go more than two levels below the > > > grandparent, it won't work. > > > > > > On 2/19/07, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > You'll need one query with 3 result maps. The result maps will be > > > > chained together with collection properties using the resultMap attribute. > > > > > > > > > > > > <resultMap id="Child"> > > > > ... > > > > <resultMap id="Parent"> > > > > <result ... resultMap="Child"/> > > > > ... > > > > <resultMap id="GrandParent"> > > > > <result ... resultMap="Parent"/> > > > > ... > > > > <select ... resultMap="GrandParent"> > > > > ... > > > > > > > > The select statement should join the tables together and you may > > > > need to be very explicit with the column names. > > > > > > > > Clinton > > > > > > > > On 2/19/07, Brad Handy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I have a table which has all of the parent/child relationships > > > > > in the same table. I would like to avoid the N+1 selects with this > > > > > construct, but it's unclear from the documentation if this can be done. > > > > > > > > > > Let's say I have the following relationships defined in the > > > > > table: > > > > > > > > > > Grand Parent > > > > > Parent 1 > > > > > Child 1 > > > > > Child 2 > > > > > Parent 2 > > > > > Parent 3 > > > > > Child 3 > > > > > Child 4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When creating the child objects for "Grand Parent", will the > > > > > same "Parent*" objects be used to add the children "Child*" objects to the > > > > > appropriate parents? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
