RE: Need comments again please.

[Jean-Seastien Perron]

As for the speed of the pages, here all around Canada each pages open below 2-3 seconds. Maybe it is slower in Europe.   With regular slow speed internet witch is used by a verrry small minority here in Quebec. It takes 45 seconds per pages.   Also that’s why there is the text version available for others. And the text version of the page appear first.   In fact I was the only one complaning about the speed of the website. 3 seconds is still slow for me and it was 10 seconds before the optimisation. Never got any complaint from Maxi-Foret or their clients.   One thing I hate is website that start by loading a java app or flash for 1 minute with a stupid and useless intro of modern art animation. Website needs to go right into the subject.   The Maxi-Foret website was experimental. I have never seen myself a website that look like it. It may not be the best desing or technologie, but it is different and sufficiently functionnal.   Next time I hope InternetExplorer will support .png with alpha. Or that everyone in the world will get a 20 megabyte /sec connection (In my dream).   Thankyou for your comments. Remember that I wasn’t pay a lot of money for this (350$ usd).   Jean-Sebastien Perron www.neuroworld.ca     De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Daniel Richter Envoyé : Tuesday, August 01, 2006 3:07 PM À : user-list@light.realsoft3d.com Objet : Re: Need comments again please.   Hey JS,   the rendering looks much better in my opinion. I still think it's a crime to use fullscreen images for a website, but depending on who you expect to look at it, it may or may not make a difference.. loaded fast enough for me. As to the buttons.. is there a reason you use invisible gifs? Thats why image maps were invented, small invisible rectangles (or circles, or polygons) that you place over an image and that work as links..   Hope that helps.. Daniel   On 8/1/06, Jean-Seastien Perron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,        I know it's not related much with Realsoft but, I updated the website www.maxiforet.com again with hi-quality rendering and a new and faster trick for the detection of the buttons for action.        This new trick is in fact an invisible .gif.        20% of the model were made in Realsoft, 80% in Shade and everything placed and rendered in messiah.        I had so many problems with messiah lately :        -Does not copy the material and texture when duplicating object.        -Does ont copy surface properties when duplicating an object.        -And there is so many bug with bones rigging.        Yes bone rigging is automated with messiah but when it's not working as you wish you are dead because the implementation of the bypass to tweak the bone influence with (meta effector) is not working when you play with the bone influence. So in short The rigging by default only works.        I WARNED YOU DON'T BUY MESSIAH, and the tech support is the worst I have ever seen 2 weeks without any answers.        Anyway, I only use it for this website.        And messiah doesn't load the scene exactly the same way from different version : 2.1 to 2.2 files don't always load or load correctly. So be carefull. And 300$ for that much shit is a verrrry expensive shit.        So back to the main subject : Do you think the website www.maxiforet.com is better, load faster and the rendering are better? Thankyou and I like the realsoft community. Jean-Sebastien Perron www.neuroworld.ca