Hi Garry,

I never used GI for a real job. Just had a look at the idea. But as it is so very slow for rendering, I always use fill lights. But I do use per box post processing a lot. Mostly for DOF effect. And as I'm rendering hi res images most of the time I can't post process the image at once because of memory shortage. So I was just assuming that it would be logical to use the same method for GI post.

At this moment I'm extremely busy on an assignment. I've to create 18 stills which have to be finished next Tuesday.

After that I'll have a look at the GI per box possibilities. I've got renewed interest in GI because of several reasons.

Arjo.

studio wrote:
David ?  I know they call me Julie on Thursday's, but David ?  8-)
Glad to be of help anyways.
Err Jason ....I think.

Hi Jason (Julie on thursday?) :

  Sorry about that . Brain's cutting out on me lately . Thanks
again for your detailed Gi expertise . Very much appreciated .

  Perhaps Arjo will find the time to offer a Post-per/box
rendering solution , but I doubt if it's feasible for the
bench or video res stuff , as you have pointed out .

  Multiple instances could easily solve the idle CPU
problem with multiple (up to 8) cores , I think .

cheers & thanks again
garry




Reply via email to