Hi Arjo : Thanks for your reply ! Maybe we should just wait and see what RSV6 brings us ? (as Mark is doing) . I noticed the V6 news on Robert's site mentions V6 Gi improvements in a few places .
Good luck with your rendering project ! garry > Hi Garry, > > I never used GI for a real job. Just had a look at the idea. But as it > is so very slow for rendering, I always use fill lights. But I do use > per box post processing a lot. Mostly for DOF effect. And as I'm > rendering hi res images most of the time I can't post process the image > at once because of memory shortage. So I was just assuming that it would > be logical to use the same method for GI post. > > At this moment I'm extremely busy on an assignment. I've to create 18 > stills which have to be finished next Tuesday. > > After that I'll have a look at the GI per box possibilities. I've got > renewed interest in GI because of several reasons. > > Arjo. > > studio wrote: > >> David ? I know they call me Julie on Thursday's, but David ? 8-) > >> Glad to be of help anyways. > >> Err Jason ....I think. > >> > > > > Hi Jason (Julie on thursday?) : > > > > Sorry about that . Brain's cutting out on me lately . Thanks > > again for your detailed Gi expertise . Very much appreciated . > > > > Perhaps Arjo will find the time to offer a Post-per/box > > rendering solution , but I doubt if it's feasible for the > > bench or video res stuff , as you have pointed out . > > > > Multiple instances could easily solve the idle CPU > > problem with multiple (up to 8) cores , I think . > > > > cheers & thanks again > > > > garry > > > > > > > > >
