>Holography would be the next step The first holographic movie I know about was in a zootrope form. The guys arranged photo plates 360 degrees around the model sitting on a chair at the centre. She rose from the chair as the plates were exposed sequentially. Then viewed with the laser split to the developed plates and arranged to make a cylinder ... when the cylinder rotated the model could be seen, in 3D, to rise from the chair. Probably all in that weird chrome doped ruby crystal laser red colour of the age. It was several decades ago now. On the west coast someplace.
>headache too but I did not, despite my bad eyesight Your "bad" eyesight probably saved you. >But nothing beats a good script ;) .............. yes!!! Lol. N. ________________________________ From: Mark Heuymans <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, 10 February, 2010 8:06:54 AM Subject: Re: stereoscopic imagery My friend got a headache too but I did not, despite my bad eyesight. Yes, maybe it has to do with the difference between eye focus and camera focus that's fixed in the image. Holography would be the next step but that's probably far away, especially holographic rendering (does that exist already??). But nothing beats a good script ;) -Mark > Hi Mark, > > I saw Avatar too in Imax format. But I must say this stereo projection gave > me a headache too. > Not just me, but my son and daughter were complaining too. > I think I had problems with focusing on the subtitles and the image at the > same time. > Furthermore, because of the 3D effect, you get the idea you can choose to > focus on background or foreground. > But that's not possible of course. > > Arjo. >
