Massive, Thanks Arjo,

The first stage of the project is fine and I think it unlikely that the
work will go beyond that. Only then will it need the format I dont seem to
have here.

I dont know the file sizes but a first assembly check file came in at 2.5
gigs. I very quickly knocked that back into mpeg1, Lol. 120 megs now!!

A bit of work yet to do however. Tweaking re-takes here and there and
sorting the sound. 

N.

On Thu, 20 May 2010 07:21:46 +0200, "Arjo Rozendaal"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
>  
> 
> I'm not sure how big your files are. But with Wetransfer.com you can
> transfer up to 2 Gig at once. No problem to convert your files with AE.
> 
>  
> 
> Arjo.
> 
>  
> 
> Van: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Neil Cooke
> Verzonden: woensdag 19 mei 2010 23:09
> Aan: [email protected]
> Onderwerp: Re: Matte shadows
> 
>  
> 
>>if you're looking for some "special things" 
> 
> better try the "Trial-Versions"
> 
>  
> 
> I have a need to export the final OS/OD streams as some format my Magix
> edition doesnt have so I will definitely be checking the "Trial
Versions"
> page!!! Hoping that they've upgraded their export formats of course.
> 
>  
> 
> However, it was just a glance at that side of things so I may be
mistaken. 
> 
>  
> 
> My other options there are download a free trial AE maybe or get a
> production house to do the conversion.
> 
>  
> 
> No problem and many thanks for your news on all this Matt!!
> 
>  
> 
> N.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Matthias Kappenberg <mailto:[email protected]>  
> 
> To: [email protected] 
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 6:10 PM
> 
> Subject: Re: Matte shadows
> 
>  
> 
> Maybe try the Demo:
>
http://www.magix.com/fi-fi/se/free-downloads/trial-versions/all-trial-versio
> ns/
> http://www.magix.com/fi-fi/se/movie-edit-pro/plus/
> 
> 
> and if you like the "old scool interface progs"
> http://www.mediachance.com/video/index.html
> 
> (http://www.mediachance.com/video/layout6big.jpg)
> 
>  
> 
> I have both of them, and as said before: Magix has recognized
> 
> my hd-cam footage without any trouble, Edit Studio is a little
> 
> bit more stable but does not like every footage.....
> 
> Both are very good programs for this price.
> 
> But if you're looking for some "special things"
> 
> better try the "Trial-Versions"
> 
>  
> 
> Matthias
> 
>  
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Neil Cooke <mailto:[email protected]>  
> 
> To: [email protected] 
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:56 PM
> 
> Subject: Re: Matte shadows
> 
>  
> 
> Correction:
> 
>  
> 
>>filters for color correction
> 
>  
> 
> I understood this to mean overall colour and or tone controls. 
> 
>  
> 
> But if (apart from blue, and black or something) you need to look at all
> instances of a colour range and shift them in a selected set of frames,
> then
> I'm not so sure.
> 
>  
> 
> Sorry for the confusion
> 
>  
> 
> Neil Cooke
> 
>  
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> 
> From: Neil Cooke <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tue, 18 May, 2010 11:14:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Matte shadows
> 
> Hi Arjo
> 
>  
> 
>>Which video comping software is that?
> 
>  
> 
> "MAGIX Movie Edit Pro 14" 
> 
>  
> 
> It's marketed as a home/family video editor so most of the
> "pre-sets/samples" do not interest me. However the "video effects" menu
> option in the editing section seems to me to have a very useful set of
> comping procedures. The internal help documentation is a massive
strength
> especially compared to the printed manuals and the online support
> community.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> I wonder if other, over-the-counter AVI editors (it does more than AVI
of
> course) have similar "hidden" abilities.
> 
>  
> 
>>adding titles and filters with this video composer you own? I mean
filters
> for color correction and stuff like that.
> 
>  
> 
> Yes, it can do all those things and far more. My guess is that it can do
> frame by frame bitmap editing but so far I have only needed to edit
whole
> "takes". A winner for me was the chromakey ability (blue screen and I'm
not
> sure that this can be changed for the app).
> 
>  
> 
> Because the pre-sets are for family type projects, I have not bothered
with
> its title and text procedures. Prefer to do them in RS. 
> 
>  
> 
> I got it because I wanted something more specialised and extensive than
the
> Windows MovieMaker app that ships with XP. It cost me $NZ160.00.  
> 
>  
> 
> N. 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> 
> From: Arjo Rozendaal <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tue, 18 May, 2010 7:37:26 PM
> Subject: RE: Matte shadows
> 
> Hi Neil,
> 
>  
> 
> Which video comping software is that?
> 
> I do own AE but I'm still interested, because as a teacher I meet people
> who're not always familiar with bitmap or video editors.
> 
> And of course I like to offer them cheap possibilities. Most of the time
> they just bought the 3D app and don't like the idea that they need to
buy
> additional software for editing bitmaps.
> 
> Might sound strange, people wanting to create 3D visuals and don't know
> about bitmap editors. But most of them are CAD designers who wish to
create
> good looking presentations.
> 
> Can you do stuff like adding titles and filters with this video composer
> you
> own? I mean filters for color correction and stuff like that.
> 
>  
> 
> Arjo.
> 
>  
> 
> Van: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Neil Cooke
> Verzonden: dinsdag 18 mei 2010 5:43
> Aan: [email protected]
> Onderwerp: Re: Matte shadows
> 
>  
> 
>>maybe a compositing app is much faster than a 3D app :-?
> 
>  
> 
> If you can live without the shadows then green screen is a breeze. 
> 
>  
> 
> But I have no idea on AE comping since my comping app is probably not up
to
> pace and remains largely unknown to me. It cost about $US80.00 as
opposed
> to
> AE at what, around $US1000.00?? 
> 
>  
> 
> The winner has to be frame by frame rotoscoping then!!! Lol.
> 
>  
> 
> N.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Matthias Kappenberg <mailto:[email protected]>  
> 
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:04 AM
> 
> Subject: Re: Matte shadows
> 
>  
> 
> @ who needs AE
> 
>  
> 
> maybe a compositing app is much faster than a 3D app :-?
> 
>  
> 
> Matthias
> 
>  
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Neil Cooke <mailto:[email protected]>  
> 
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> 
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 7:51 PM
> 
> Subject: Re: Matte shadows
> 
>  
> 
>>imposing shadows into live picture or into live film
> 
>  
> 
> I dont see why the textureanim material that allows anims to show within
> raytrace renders on rectangles or whatever, cant be incorporated
directly
> into the matteshadow material. 
> 
>  
> 
> If so then "Who needs After Effects"? Lol.
> 
>  
> 
> N.
> 
>  
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> 
> From: Ville Tirronen <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tue, 18 May, 2010 2:01:45 AM
> Subject: Re: Matte shadows
> 
> 
> My apology to you. Offcourse it was in
> tutorprojects/material/vsl/alphashadows :)
> This is what I mean by imposing shadows into live picture or into live
> film.
> Sorry guys. This tutorial gives quite good shadow control. Still have to
> investigate
> this more though. Hmm.. Now I have get light effects into live video:)
> 
> Ville
> 
> On 05/17/2010 10:31 AM, Matthias Kappenberg wrote: 
> 
> It's in the "Material" as Texture Map.....
> 
> (Maybe you must swizch the VSL-Shader to "Advanced")
> 
>  
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> Matthias Kappenberg
> 
>  
> 
> Tel.: 0511-8091473
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2879 - Release Date: 05/17/10
> 18:26:00
> 
>   _____  
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2882 - Release Date: 05/19/10
> 06:26:00

Reply via email to