(Boris Kraft) wrote:
On 28.12.2005, at 11:00, (Michael Wechner) wrote:
thanks for the info. I am totally fine with that Magnolia is being
governed by a subsidiary of obinary, but it might make sense to
declare this on the website, resp. I couldn't find that info (sorry
if I might have missed that).
Michi
Added:
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/about-magnolia.html
thanks. Just being curious, but why did you found a wholly owned subsidiary
of obinary to govern the Magnolia project? It seems to me that since
"Magnolia Inc" is a wholly owned subsidiary of obinary, you could also have
used obinary itself. Well, on second thought it probably makes sense for
legal reasons, in case somebody is suing Magnolia Inc because of
licensing or whatever reasons. Or what other reasons are there?
Please don't get me wrong, I am not up to something ;-) but just
curious/interested what the reasoning for the different models are.
Thanks
Michi
Thanks
- Boris
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
