Cheers Robert, >Not sure if “quad core” is the current processor architecture
Have heard of some weird and wonderful virtual core set-ups in Windows and Linux but as far as the data I have is concerned, and without going to a dedicated multi-processor render farm set-up ... quad seems to be useful. Some have hyper-threading giving another four processors (virtual processors). The word I have is that a distributed rendering set-up such as RS would be looking for actual cores only. Still some way off this part of the task however. Thanks for your post. N. On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Robert den Broeder <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Neico,**** > > ** ** > > Sounds like a solid plan. Not sure if “quad core” is the current processor > architecture, but I am sure some techy guy here will have the answer to > that.**** > > ** ** > > Best, Robert**** > > ** ** > > *Van:* User-list [mailto:[email protected]] *Namens *Neil > Cooke > *Verzonden:* vrijdag 30 augustus 2013 2:05 > *Aan:* [email protected] > *Onderwerp:* [User-list] 64 bit and processors**** > > ** ** > > Hi List Wizards ...**** > > Sooner or later I will need to shift the low resolution (640 wide) takes > of the movie into 1920pixel wide beasts. **** > > My assumptions are these.**** > > 1. Shift to RS 64 bit edition.**** > > 2. Get a quad core machine (hyperthreading is assumed to be no extra gain > and actual cores are the way to go for RS rendering).**** > > 3. OS to be Win7 x 64 bit.**** > > Yes?**** > > TIA**** > > Neico. **** > > _______________________________________________ > User-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://realsoft.com/mailman/listinfo/user-list_realsoft.com > >
_______________________________________________ User-list mailing list [email protected] http://realsoft.com/mailman/listinfo/user-list_realsoft.com
