Very many thanks for your posts folks! Exactly the data I need.
N. On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 2:21 AM, rslist <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree 100% with Matthias. > > Cheers ;) > > > On 8/30/2013 6:41 AM, Matthias Kappenberg wrote: > >> Jepp, that's right. >> If you need only the renderpower for RS, then it's maybe better to buy >> some "smaller" machines with a good i7 and some RAM... >> and set up a render network. >> But if you have After-Effects or some other applications, then >> you're maybe better with a bigger CPU on one machine. >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 30.08.2013 14:30, schrieb rslist: >> >>> Yes, oh so fast at rendering, but big $$$ for chip(s), and the MBs are >>> also very pricey :( >>> >>> brandon >>> >>> On 8/30/2013 6:24 AM, Matthias Kappenberg wrote: >>> >>>> Have a look for 8-Core Xeons, too. >>>> They're running fine ;-) >>>> >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 30.08.2013 02:04, schrieb Neil Cooke: >>>> >>>>> Hi List Wizards ... >>>>> >>>>> Sooner or later I will need to shift the low resolution (640 wide) >>>>> takes >>>>> of the movie into 1920pixel wide beasts. >>>>> >>>>> My assumptions are these. >>>>> 1. Shift to RS 64 bit edition. >>>>> 2. Get a quad core machine (hyperthreading is assumed to be no extra >>>>> gain and actual cores are the way to go for RS rendering). >>>>> 3. OS to be Win7 x 64 bit. >>>>> >>>>> Yes? >>>>> >>>>> TIA >>>>> >>>>> Neico. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > > ______________________________**_________________ > User-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://realsoft.com/mailman/**listinfo/user-list_realsoft.**com<http://realsoft.com/mailman/listinfo/user-list_realsoft.com> >
_______________________________________________ User-list mailing list [email protected] http://realsoft.com/mailman/listinfo/user-list_realsoft.com
