Am 20.10.2014 um 14:13 schrieb Richard Weinberger:

> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Meyer <tho...@m3y3r.de> wrote:
>> Am 20.10.2014 11:28 schrieb Daniel Walter <sa...@0x90.at>:
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Thomas Meyer" <tho...@m3y3r.de>
>>>> To: "user-mode-linux-devel" <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 4:14:13 PM
>>>> Subject: [uml-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] um: enable trace irqflags support
>>>> 
>>>> Add TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT to UML.
>>>> This enables LOCKDEP_SUPPORT and TRACING_SUPPORT.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> FYI: I'm currently working on porting ftrace() support to
>>> uml. It will take another week or two since I don't have enough
>>> time to debug, and it isn't stable yet (read as is panic()ing randomly)
>> 
>> Good to know :-)
>> 
>> Thanks for you stack trace support work!
>> 
>> BTW. When triggering a sysrq t with the uml console the stack trace is not 
>> displayed, it says that the stack trace failed because a sigsegv happens in 
>> the stack trace or something like that. Bug or feature?
> 
> Huh? More details please. uml_mconsole's sysrq t works fine here with
> both x86 and x86_86 uml.
Hi,

sorry about the fuss. everything seems to work correctly.

Maybe I did see this while doing some testing with some fixes.

sorry.

> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> //richard


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to