On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> wrote:
> Am 03.03.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Lorenzo Colitti:
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Richard Weinberger
>> <richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> IIRC the big plan is to make tracehook_report_syscall_entry() tree-wide
>>> void.
>>
>> Ack, thanks. In the meantime, for trees we already build with -Werror,
>> we'll put a temporary local hack in place.
>
> As long GCC has a shitload of completely useless warnings building with
> -Werror
> is just a PITA. That's why Linux does not use that flag. :-)
For some classes of warnings yet.
For this particular case, given the tree-wide void plan, it can easily be
resolved by dropping the __must_check attribute from
tracehook_report_syscall_entry() now.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
