Hello everyone,

I would like to finish this patch, but I'm currently very busy. Sorry!

Anton: it would be great if you could finish this patch! Much appreciated!

With kind regards
Thomas

Am 14.10.2015 8:12 vorm. schrieb Anton Ivanov <anton.iva...@kot-begemot.co.uk>:
>
> Thomas, I need to know if you have the time-slices for this or I should 
> take over and finish it. 
>
> In addition to what Richard said I have the epoll based IRQ controller 
> and high-performance network pipeline which depend on it in the queue. 
>
> Brgds, 
>
> A. 
>
> On 13/10/15 22:45, Richard Weinberger wrote: 
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Thomas Meyer <tho...@m3y3r.de> wrote: 
> >> Am 15.08.2015 10:15 vorm. schrieb Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>: 
> >>> Am 09.08.2015 um 19:53 schrieb Thomas Meyer: 
> >>>> Switch the UML clocksource from interval timers to posix interval timers 
> >>>> and 
> >>>> move to a monotonic timer. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> This fixes suspend&resume related timer issues and improves network 
> >>>> performance 
> >>>> as TCP state machines are now fed with the correct time; also correct 
> >>>> QoS and 
> >>>> traffic shaping. 
> >>> The patch is rather big. Please describe in your commit message how 
> >>> exactly 
> >>> it works and why. 
> >>> It changes many internals. 
> >> Will do so! 
> > Can I get an updated version of that patch? 
> > I really want to merge it in the next merge window. 
> > 
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
> User-mode-linux-devel mailing list 
> User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to