On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 08:16:52PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Thursday 10 February 2005 20:04, Al Viro wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 07:39:23PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > > > 3) I don't understand how vmlinux.lds.S is created... it's a symlink, but > > > it's created nowhere after the patch - maybe I overlook something, maybe > > > you didn't do "make clean" and retest. > > > Not a symlink anymore. It's right there in the patch - > Nice trick. > In this case, it got lost in the version at that URL (I don't know whose is > the fault). I triple-checked that the file is missing at that URL. > > Btw, did you also fix the typo I mentioned?
See another reply upthread. BTW, patch is going to be split - right now it's a big lump of unrelated fixes. I'm waiting for Sam to return with comments on headers layout... ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
