On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 17:22 -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Why not simply disable CONFIG_GCOV for him, in this case?
>
> Anton presumably turned on CONFIG_GCOV because he wanted to do some
> profiling...
Yes. I finally found a way to get it to compile. Compiling without TT
mode and WITHOUT static build it still fails with the same problem
(__bb_init_func problem I already reported). But compiling without TT
but WITH static build the __bb_init_func problem goes away but instead I
get a __gcov_init missing symbol in my modules.
Note I have gcc-3.3.4-11 (SuSE 9.2) and it defines __gcov_init. So I
added this as an export symbol and lo and behold the kernel and modules
compiled and I am now up an running with UML and NTFS as a module. (-:
Here is the patch that I used to fix this:
--- ntfs-2.6-devel/arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.c.old 2005-02-14
11:27:04.789474410 +0000
+++ ntfs-2.6-devel/arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.c 2005-02-14 11:26:49.191117739
+0000
@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
extern void __bb_init_func(void *);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bb_init_func);
+extern void __gcov_init(void *);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__gcov_init);
+
/*
* Overrides for Emacs so that we follow Linus's tabbing style.
* Emacs will notice this stuff at the end of the file and automatically
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
