Unify the spinlock initialization as far as possible.

Do consider applying.

Signed-off-by: Amit Gud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---


 kj-domen/arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c~spin_lock_init-arch_um_drivers_port_kern 
arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c
--- kj/arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c~spin_lock_init-arch_um_drivers_port_kern     
2005-03-05 16:11:13.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c        2005-03-05 16:11:13.000000000 
+0100
@@ -185,11 +185,11 @@ void *port_data(int port_num)
                  .has_connection       = 0,
                  .sem                  = __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(port->sem, 
                                                                  0),
-                 .lock                 = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
                  .port                 = port_num,
                  .fd                   = fd,
                  .pending              = LIST_HEAD_INIT(port->pending),
                  .connections          = LIST_HEAD_INIT(port->connections) });
+       spin_lock_init(&port->lock);
        list_add(&port->list, &ports);
 
  found:
_


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to