[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> This patch is still wrong.
> It seems my comment on this [1] was lost:
> <-- snip -->
> This line has to be something like
> ( (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 3 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 4)
> && \
> HEAVILY_PATCHED_SUSE_GCC )
> I hope SuSE has added some #define to distinguish what they call "gcc
> 3.3.4" from GNU gcc 3.3.4
It wasn't lost - I am just disinclined to cater to distros making their
gcc lie about its version.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
